Our Independent Regulator Impress has just published a draft of its proposed Standards Code, and they are looking for public comment on it.
As the final version of the code will govern the standards followed by Ferret journalists the outcome of this process will have an impact on how we operate.
Therefore, if you have any comment on it, please add your thoughts to this thread, and we’ll consider them should we make any formal response to the consultation.
You can download the draft code from here: draft-impress-standards-code.pdf (176.3 KB)
According to Impress:
In line with international standards, the draft Code addresses the following issues:
* Public Interest
Jonathan Heawood, IMPRESS CEO, said: “We have, for the first time in the UK and in line with what Lord Justice Leveson recommended, held a thorough and wide-ranging consultation into a new Standards Code.
“We have had significant input from the public and from journalists. The Code is intended to be a practical working tool that enables journalists, editors and publishers to do their jobs. It should be easily understood by the public and enforceable through regulation. The Code has been designed for the era of digital publication, with full respect for transparency and public interest.”
The Code is designed with the challenges of digital publication in mind. It will apply to publications regulated by IMPRESS regardless of medium or platform. It asks publishers to respect privacy settings on social media unless there is a public interest justification for overriding them (clause 7.2), not to lift content from social media or elsewhere without attribution (clause 2.1) and to give reasonable consideration to the request of a person who was previously identified as a child in a news story and now wishes their identity to be concealed (clause 3.3). These provisions and others are intended to help publishers, editors and journalists navigate the ethical minefield of news publishing in the digital era.
In response to growing concerns among journalists and audiences about the impact of paid-for content on editorial freedom, the draft Code asks publishers to make absolutely clear where content has been paid for financially or through a reciprocal arrangement and is controlled by a third party (clause 10.1) and to take all reasonable steps to declare significant conflicts of interest (clause 10.2).
The Code provides a clear definition of the public interest which reflects international best practice in this area. It requires publishers, when undertaking an action which may otherwise breach the Code, to make a note of their reason for believing that action is in the public interest.
The Standards Code is now in the final phase of consultation. IMPRESS is inviting submissions. Please respond to the consultation by clicking here.
The final consultation will close at 5pm on Thursday 29th September after which the Standards Code will be finalised and published with explanatory guidelines by the IMPRESS Board.